May 25, 2013

Why Did the U.S. Government Sue Standard & Poor’s?


Read the original article at Money Morning

The U.S. Justice Department slapped Standard & Poor’s Rating Services with a lawsuit claiming the agency sidestepped its own standards when rating mortgage bonds that collapsed during the financial crisis, resulting in billions of dollars in losses for investors.

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder’s civil charges, filed late Monday against S&P, are the first federal enforcement charges against a credit rating firm over the financial crisis.

Reports say the government is going after S&P to the tune of more than $1 billion.

Following a report in The Wall Street Journal Monday afternoon that the government planned to file the suit, S&P acknowledged it was expecting the action and claimed the firm was being wrongly punished by the U.S. government for “failing to predict” the housing meltdown or financial crisis.

New York-based S&P, one of the three major rating firms, has denied any wrongdoing. The firm said in a statement before the government filed the suit that it would be “entirely without factual or legal merit.”

To continue reading, please click here…

Read the original article at Money Morning

The Frightening Financial Crisis Facing Young Americans


Read the original article at Money Morning

Young Americans are falling deeper and deeper into a financial crisis that will be nearly impossible to escape from in their lifetimes.

Unfortunately, the problems start at a very young age. Not only do a record number of school-age children live in poverty, but the number of homeless children in the public school system has reached an all-time high.

Even young adults who are able to attend college have trouble supporting themselves after graduation. Students take on mountains of debt to pay for school, but all too many of them can’t find a decent job that covers their bills and their loans.

And those who do find jobs will likely be working for many more years than previous generations. That’s because Social Security is expected to run out well before today’s youngest workers retire. Those who have failed to save enough will end up working into their 60s, 70s and 80s.

“We don’t know how the story ends, but we know how the story is beginning,” Paul Taylor, executive vice president of the Pew Research Center, told CNN. “At the beginning, today’s young people are not doing better than yesterday’s young adults.”

Here are 14 startling statistics painting a bleak financial picture for many young Americans.

To continue reading, please click here…

Read the original article at Money Morning

Four Debt-Free Companies to Own if the Markets Tank–and Even if They Don’t


Read the original article at Money Morning

Many investors remain on the sidelines under the impression that every company has been stopped in its tracks by the financial crisis. Somehow they’ve convinced themselves there’s nothing worth owning.

The problem is it’s just not true. Companies that carry little or no debt are kicking butt and will continue to do so even if the markets stumble.

Not only are most of them tacking on solid numbers in very volatile markets, but over time these debt-free companies are proving themselves to be stable and reliable performers.

Take last year for example. The S&P 500 returned 2%. Yet, the top 15 firms as measured by the highest amount of cash and short-term investments as a percentage of total assets returned an average of 15% according to CNBC analyst Giovanny Moreano.

That’s 650% more than their debt-laden brethren over the same time frame.

So far this year, my favorite debt-free companies have tacked on average gains of 19.82% versus the S&P 500, which was up 9% as of July 3. That’s a 120% advantage over the same time period.

Going further back these same companies have done even better.

In fact, my favorite debt-free choices have returned an average of 349.16% versus a loss of -3% for the S&P 500 as a whole since the top of 2007 when the financial crisis broke.

Over the past decade that number jumps to over 2,061%. And, I’ll bet you dimes to Bernanke dollars that these same debt-free companies will pull ahead further in the years to come.

To continue reading, please click here…

Read the original article at Money Morning

Barclays Libor Scandal: Britain Hopes for "New Culture" of Banking


Read the original article at Money Morning

The Barclays Libor scandal involving price fixing of key interbank lending rates has already led to two major resignations at the bank, and has increased scrutiny on the global financial industry.

Barclays (NYSE ADR: BCS) last week was slapped with a $456 million fine for rigging Libor rates, the rates banks charge each other for loans.

The record fine was levied to settle an investigation into attempted manipulation and false reporting related to two benchmark interest rates. Those rates help determine terms of loans and financial contracts around the world that form the basis for hundreds of trillions of dollars’ worth of transactions.

The news has been a major blow to Barclays’ once stellar reputation, and now led to the fall of Chief Executive Officer Bob Diamond.

Barclays CEO Diamond Resigns

Diamond resigned Tuesday, a day after Chairman Marcus Agius stepped down amid the scandal.

“The external pressure placed on Barclays has reached a level that risks damaging the franchise – I cannot let that happen,” Diamond said in a statement Tuesday.

Agius took the blame Monday, acting as the fall guy. He said in a statement, the “buck stops with me, and I must acknowledge responsibility by standing aside.”

Then a pressured Diamond announced he would leave, and Britain’s politicians and regulators labeled this the first step towards “a new culture of British banking.”

Scores of shareholders lobbied for Diamond to take responsibility.

John Mann, a Labour politician and among the panel of lawmakers who this week will question Diamond and Agius, said Monday on Sky News, “He (Diamond) must resign. He”s got to go. There is no role for people like him if banking is to be trusted again in this country and if British banking is to restore its tarnished reputation in the world, which of course is of great importance to our economy.”

Agius will lead the bank temporarily and help search for a new CEO.

Barclays’ board, trying to do some damage control, announced it would begin an audit of the financial services firm’s business practices.

To continue reading, please click here…

Read the original article at Money Morning

Fed Lets Banks Off the Hook… Again


Read the original article at Money Morning

We’ve told you before that the U.S. Federal Reserve puts Wall Street’s interest above that of the American public. And yesterday (Wednesday) the central bank proved it… again.

Confronted with the opportunity to enact meaningful change to the regulatory system, the Fed punted on its responsibility to protect the public from the very banks that brought down the global economy.

This once again proves that the Fed, far from being a guardian of public welfare, is actually on the side of big banks.

“The Fed is an agent of the banks and, as such, it continues to come up with new ways for them to make money, risk free,” said Money MorningCapital Waves Strategist Shah Gilani.

This time, instead of proposing strong guidelines that would actually do something to avoid another crisis caused by too-big-to-fail banks, the Fed put forth a plan that lacks key details and leaves important decisions in the hands of international regulators in Basil, Switzerland.

Specifically, the Fed proposal is hazy on capital requirements and minimum liquidity levels, which are crucial to ensuring a bank survives a financial emergency.

Delay has been a common theme for agencies charged with creating the regulations set out in Dodd-Frank. As of the beginning of December – 18 months after Dodd-Frank was signed into law – fewer than 25% of its hundreds of new rules have been finalized.

On Tuesday, it was the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)voting to delay until July of next year regulations governing derivatives – the financial instruments that were at the very heart of the 2008 financial crisis.

And by forfeiting its chance to effect change, the Fed left the United States even more vulnerable to another financial crisis.

Now, not only have these vital regulations been delayed, but the process gives well-connected Wall Street bankers three months to “comment” – read “influence” – on the proposals.

Following the Fed’s announcement, the banking industry didn’t seem particularly worried that the finished regulations, when they do arrive, will cause them much of a headache.

“While these rules will require considerable review and comment from the industry, we are pleased to see the Fed is taking a phased-in approach to a number of these measures,” Ken Bentsen, an executive vice president the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association trade group, told Bloomberg.

A headline on CNBC summed it up nicely: “Banks Breathe Sigh of Relief Over New Fed Rules.”

Indeed, Wall Street isn’t concerned because at the end of the day, it knows the Fed is its ally.

“The average American has no idea how protected the big banks in this country really are,” said Money Morning‘s Gilani. “Maybe that’s because the biggest bank in the world is the U.S. Federal Reserve. And it happens to be a creation of – and 100% beholden to – the banks that it is a master shill for. It also lies to us and covers up Wall Street’s misdeeds.”

To continue reading, please click here…

Read the original article at Money Morning